The army training management cycle is the basis of the military training program, developed circa World War II by the U.S. Army. It gives all soldiers a principal set of management tools that can be transported up the chain of command. This means that all soldiers with competent training for the army can be expected to embark upon a commanding function whenever a superior officer is not available.
The purpose of the army learning management system, and that of the U.S. Army itself, is to guard the country and its constitution. The end result of the army training course is the development of an armed force capable of winning wars, preserving domestic calm and inhibiting military combat around the planet by showing force. Once can make a case that the deterrence component by itself/oneself has saved many lives by halting immeasurable possible wars, a principal consequence of the army training management cycle.
Education for the army is promised to enhance and reinforce the army’s main strengths as a combat force: shaping the security environment, immediate response, mobilization of the Army, militant entry operations, sustained land authority and support of civil authorities. By virtue of the army training management cycle, each new recruit is changed into a versatile but deadly authority capable of leading men even if his rank does not indicate it.
The decisive aspect of the army training management cycle is its hierarchical character. Almost every soldier will get to know soldiers who outrank him and others who he outranks. The higher officer drills his subordinates into army education, and then the inferiors return the favor to the next band of recruits. This army training course system provides direct substitutes if a senior officer retires or dies. In times of war, this is especially important since leadership switches occur frequently in combat zones. Transfers, injuries, deaths, promotions and more can transform underlings into leaders at any time. The army training management cycle establishes an explicit hierarchy, so each soldier knows who the leader in the event of a switch.
Even though this education for the army system has its origins in the army, it has advanced to the other armed force divisions as well as distinct sovereign armed forces around the planet. It is also common in the business world. Common workers rise to managers; managers climb the ladder to presidents, and so forth. Law enforcement follows a similar system as well. In the United States, law enforcement departments even use many of the equivalent ranks as the military: sergeant, corporal, lieutenant and so on.
One possible problem with the training management cycle is the keeping of soldiers. While several enlisted persons intend to work their way up the ranks of the armed forces as high as they can, others only want to go through the lowest term to guarantee some advantage or perform an obligation. This can disrupt training for the army since it counts on habitual promotion to combat the attrition of higher-ranked soldiers. In addition, soldiers who fail to progress in the ranks are limited to moderate compensation and bottom-rung employment responsibilities.
Even with these deficiencies, the army training management cycle’s strengths have confirmed themselves many times over, and that is why it endures even now.
Learn how the army training management cycle turns all soldiers into leaders.
Army training guide: Click for more information.
